Open
01 / Requirements
Know what matters
The outcome, the stack already in place, the person who still has to approve, and the detail that can sink the concept.
Approach/Knowledge first
From the request to a concept you can build.
Threads, specs, and the way the work already runs become requirements, a solution concept, and a plan. Knowledge solving is the first step. Engineering follows.
ThreadSpecCallStackDeckScopeTradeoffsPlanConcept rev 01
Before the build
Most projects go wrong before the first commit.
The request shows up as a thread, a deck, and a spreadsheet. Someone has to turn it into a decision while the opportunity is still warm. We used to start at the build. Now, as AI experts rather than feature engineers, we solve the knowledge problem first.
Before the build / 014·Live
Capture
Customer context
Threads, specs, calls, and the systems already in place.
Explore
Requirements
Constraints, open questions, and what actually has to be true.
Shape
Solution concept
Viable approaches, and the tradeoffs between them.
Build
From what you know
A starting point the team can review, then ship.
The practice
From the first call to a concept you can approve.
The early work stays in one place, with the decisions behind the design. Select a step. The concept abovebeside it shows what that step is solving.
Solution concept / 014Rev 01
01 / Capture
Thread
Spec
Call
Stack
02 / Explore
- Outcome: fewer handoffs in the same week
- Constraint: stays inside the current stack
- Open: who approves the exception
Path A
Assist the expert
Path B
Run the workflow
03 / Shape
Knowledge
Decision
System
04 / Build from what you know
Analyze
Build
Maintain
Feasibility
The open question still blocks the architecture.
What changes
Fewer blank pages. More decisions made on purpose.
What changes
Outcomes / rev 0101 / 04
01 / Speed
Move while it's warm
A credible concept while the conversation is still alive.
02 / Options
Look at more than one path
03 / Memory
Carry the knowledge forward
04 / Early catch
Catch the miss early
Room to explore
More than one way to build it.
We put the constraints, the tradeoffs, and the open feasibility questions on the table, so you can compare real options before anyone commits to an architecture.
Path A
Cost
Risk
Time
Path B
Cost
Risk
Time
02 / Tradeoffs
See what changes
Compare approaches across cost, risk, time, and how the work actually runs. One answer is not the point.
Gap found
03 / Feasibility
Find the problem early
Pressure-test the concept against data, interfaces, and the steps a person still owns before anyone commits to an architecture.
What carries forward
What we learn, we keep using.
Years of architectures, integrations, and the calls that held up in production. That knowledge stays active, so the next concept does not start from scratch.
Prior architecturesPlaybooksIntegrationsDomain notesDelivery patternsEngineering judgment
Next concept
Start here
Start your next build with the problem already solved.
An AI team that understands the problem before it writes the system. Send what you have; we will tell you what we would look at first.
Monthly Digest
MyTyTech Newsletter
AI insights, blogs, case studies, software tips & events - delivered monthly.
- AI insights & deep dives
- Engineering case studies
- Curated software tips
- Upcoming events & launches
MyTyTechLabsWe craft intelligent web, mobile, cloud, and AI/ML products that help startups and enterprises move faster, smarter, and at lower cost.